User Tools

Site Tools


dev:proposals:timetable_plan

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
dev:proposals:timetable_plan [2026-01-09 20:22] – news orwelldev:proposals:timetable_plan [2026-01-22 20:00] (current) – orwell
Line 204: Line 204:
  
 Note: It may still be necessary to introduce some kind of "super cycle counter" if we need to represent times from a different cycle. But to avoid numbers going unnecessarily large, even this one should be capped (maybe at 7 days? 30 days?) Note: It may still be necessary to introduce some kind of "super cycle counter" if we need to represent times from a different cycle. But to avoid numbers going unnecessarily large, even this one should be capped (maybe at 7 days? 30 days?)
 +
 +**Now implemented as follows:**
 +1 cycle == 1 day (24 hours). Repeating times hard-clip at day boundary.
 +RWT wraps after 7 days (cycles)
 +
 +//It is very important to reiterate: to manipulate railway times one should always use the rwt functions.//
 +
 +The only guarantee made is that time intervals (not absolute times) may be safely treated as a number as long as they don't exceed 3 days worth of seconds
dev/proposals/timetable_plan.txt · Last modified: by orwell